Build a trading research system that explains before it acts.
MLAP organizes market data, news, analyst content, history, portfolio context and risk controls into specialist Agents. Traders get structured intelligence, traceable evidence and enforceable decision boundaries instead of a black-box buy or sell signal.
Split the problem by responsibility and time horizon.
The top-level Trading Agent receives two coordinated views: what is happening now and what history says about similar conditions.
Trading/ ├── agent.yaml ├── Current/ │ ├── News/ │ │ ├── GlobalMarketNews/ │ │ ├── IndianMarketNews/ │ │ └── SectorNews/ │ ├── YouTube/ │ │ ├── Channel-A/ │ │ └── Channel-B/ │ └── MarketData/ │ ├── IndexData/ │ ├── SectorData/ │ └── VolatilityData/ ├── History/ │ ├── ExchangeData/ │ ├── LocalData/ │ └── HistoricalPatterns/ ├── Risk/ ├── Portfolio/ └── Execution/
A practical Agent model for trading research and control.
MLAP helps traders convert noisy market inputs into explainable research packages. LLMs can interpret and summarize, while deterministic services keep risk, approval and execution under strict control.
Current market view
Track price, volume, volatility, news, macro signals and sector movement in one workflow.
Historical context
Compare today with similar regimes, prior events, patterns and strategy outcomes.
Research synthesis
Combine market data, analyst content and source evidence into a structured trading view.
Risk-first decisions
Check exposure, liquidity, concentration and limits before any action is allowed.
Human approval
Keep sensitive decisions visible, reviewable and approved by the right person or policy.
Learning loop
Store predictions, outcomes and failed reasoning so future analysis gets sharper.
Not every trading Agent needs an LLM.
MLAP lets deterministic data work and model-assisted interpretation live in the same hierarchy.
Deterministic Agents
- Exchange and API acquisition
- Price and volume calculations
- Indicator generation
- Duplicate detection and time alignment
- Backtesting and performance metrics
LLM-assisted Agents
- News and transcript interpretation
- Claim and sentiment extraction
- Contradiction and source comparison
- Research summarization
- Explanation of a structured result
Research can be intelligent. Risk and execution must be enforceable.
Risk Engine
Checks exposure, leverage, liquidity, concentration, loss limits, market hours and instrument rules.
Approval Gate
Requires a human or explicitly authorized policy decision before sensitive actions.
Execution Service
Owns broker connectivity, order validation, idempotency, acknowledgements and cancellation.
Compare today’s view with what the system already learned.
Each Agent can preserve evidence and outcomes so later analysis can improve without treating every new prompt as a blank slate.
Persist with provenance
Store source references, timestamps, model context, confidence, assumptions, market regime and resulting outcome.
Learn without self-deception
Separate prediction from result, record failed reasoning, avoid silently rewriting history and preserve contradictory evidence.
“What changed, and is a trade even allowed?”
A realistic MLAP workflow produces an inspectable decision package rather than a mysterious buy or sell instruction.
Question: What changed in Sector-A today? Current Agents: - price and volatility snapshot - news claims and source references - sector and index relationships History Agents: - similar market regimes - prior event outcomes - strategy performance under similar conditions Trading result: - observed facts - competing interpretations - confidence and uncertainty - candidate scenarios - evidence references Risk result: - exposure check - position-size limit - liquidity check - approval requirement - executable / rejected decision
The value is the coordination model, not a magical prediction layer.
Composition
New sources and research methods become child Agents without redesigning Trading.
Context
Current, historical and portfolio knowledge can be combined with clear ownership.
Traceability
Findings, evidence, execution IDs and outcomes can be followed through the hierarchy.
Control
Risk, approval and execution remain outside unconstrained model reasoning.
Learning
Predictions and outcomes can update persistent knowledge for future analysis.
Replaceability
Data providers, models, storage and deployment can evolve independently.